Rejected Submission RUDaaS Missile

I fail to see how this could not follow the three light second rule, when that rule is an attack launched from outside of that range is going to miss.

It also has in the rules that missiles make their own ‘attack roll’ on their final pass.

If you want you can even count this as a small drone instead of a missile since it already is within the guidelines for that.

I’m within the submission rules from multiple angles here. If you guys have a problem with the rules then you should be bringing it up in another thread.

See this post as to why you're not following the "three light second rule," Zack - and there is nothing in the Starship Combat Guide regarding missiles making "their own 'attack roll' on their final pass."

Missiles are not counted as drones - nor is there any "guideline" that refers to them as such in the Weapon Limitations - and you are wrong, @Zack. You are not "within the submission rules from multiple angles" - you, as demonstrated below, are breaking "the submission rules from multiple angles."

• This submission does not comply with the Weapon Limitations, thus violating General Rule 1k of the Submission Rules. This is because in its current form the submission grants more weapons to the Pine Class Warship then allowed by the Weapon Limitations; see this post for a more in-depth explanation and two solutions.
• According to the Submission Rules, this submission is not wanted, as in its current form it fulfills the requirements of the fifth bullet point under the Unwanted Articles section due to obviously being designed to circumvent, min-max, or ignore current SARP rules and systems such as the Starship Combat Guide and Weapon Limitations. See this post and this post for solutions.
• According to the Reviewing Submissions guide, this submission should be politely turned down, as in its current form it fulfills all three bullet points located within the second part of the Limitations sub-section. This is because of it...
  • Threatening the entire setting by easily allowing USO to wipe out the major factions in the RP. See this post for a solution.
  • Being better then everyone else's stuff without a justification as to why it is better. See this post for a solution.
  • Being a technology obviously designed to circumvent, min-max, or ignore current SARP rules and systems such as the Starship Combat Guide and Weapon Limitations. See this post and this post for solutions.
• According to the Reviewing Submissions guide, this submission cannot be approved, as in its current form it does not meet the ninth item of the checklist found in the Checklist for Reviewers section due to not complying with Star Army's rules regarding starship combat, submissions, and weapon limitations.

I'm looking at wiki articles for the C9 Pine class. I think it's time we rereview this with the pine class in mind as its carrier. Something like this should have been submitted with the vertical cell launcher in mind. Now I wouldn't mind the vertical cell launcher being considered one weapon, but adding free weapons to any ship is bypassing the weapon limitations and while I think it is a dumbass rule it is a rule none the less. There are too many things working against this submission, and while I would hate to reject it that is currently the only option that we seem to have are you sure that we cannot work this out, Zack? I really want this submission to be approved, but it cannot exist in this state

These articles can be re-submitted at another time in separate submission threads so that they can be judged fairly as stand-alone pieces.

Rejected