Silverthorne
Inactive Member
Can a fighter have a significantly higher top speed than a battleship, due to it being a tiny fraction of the mass and thus being able to accelerate considerably faster with much less structural strain?
Or the inverse; Battleships having higher FTL speeds due to it's much more generous FTL system, in comparison to the ones that have to be small (and therefore low-powered) enough to fit in fighters?
And does "style" count towards speed as tech does? Can a racing ship count as a higher tech bracket than a military craft of the same size? Lightly armored ones have faster STL speeds than heavily armored ones of the same type?
IMO..
A fighter should have a higher top speed than a battleship. Being able to move in and out of larger ships that are heading into battle, as a protective measure.
A battleship on the other hand would indeed have a more powerful FTL engine, and be able to move to battle sites on its own power while, fighter would need a carrier of sorts.
Racing ships would have a higher speed than military ships due to lack of weapons and military grade armor and shields. Less mass to slow the ship.