Honestly better to just put it in the name of the vessel then rely on a complicated confusing number and letter scheme.I disagree with this as there are systems behind the naming that if you get to know help you identify the type of vessel a class is.
Why bother using a complex nomenclature system when you can do the same thing with a sentence?I also disagree. It works fine and serves the purpose Ametheliana states it does. Nor is it complicated.
What trouble do you have with it? Could we amend it to make it easier for you, or more expansive?
Because for others, the system doesn't appear broken. And it still does what we meant it to do -- ID maker, type, etc. of product.
It could identify more things. Maybe it needs expanding. But you're asking to toss something out. You haven't shown how it's burdensome, though I can imagine your twenty or so submissions play a role.
Pretty much in line with Fred here.I have no appetite to relitigate old submissions. I meant the 20 or so he just submitted.
Fred's points are reasonable. I was hoping Arieg would say something similar.
If the argument against the nomenclature is couched as Fred has it, OK. That's a viable argument. @Wes should have a chance to weigh in.
I don't see anybody actually using.
Fair enough. Why is it even needed?
Also that kind of proves what fred was saying.
I'd be cool with multiple versions of a nomenclature system, maybe requiring a date so there's some consistency across the site. In my own work, its kind of silly to have my Theradactans using the same system as Yamatai, who they haven't even met yet. Sure, right now it has an OOC purpose, but if we're never using it ICly, then in my eyes it doesn't really have much of a point except as another box on the checklist.
Standard Product Nomenclature exists so that:That's why we have factional variants of the Standard Product Nomenclature System, @Acewing13.
(Seriously, I can't wait to show y'all the one I've been making for le birbs)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?