What if your company spans across multiple factions and territories with their production capabilities?
If Wes doesn't like something he can ask you to change it or change it himself.the decision to falls to them or the Setting Manager
Except that doesn't bypass the build up limitations at all. Because build up limitations are based on the current -use- of the ships not who made it or such, as I just explained in the post right above your's. If it's a corporate ship being used for national defense, it still counts for military build up.It is pretty hilarious that the loophole exists that you could require corporations in your territory to maintain a private fleet and then use your government mandate to immediately cease and nationalise those vessels, entirely bypassing the buildup limits.
Except that doesn't bypass the build up limitations at all. Because build up limitations are based on the current -use- of the ships not who made it or such, as I just explained in the post right above your's. If it's a corporate ship being used for national defense, it still counts for military build up.
We're not removing sovereign rights. We're placing a 'magical OOC barrier up. We're not blocking their right to cease property. What's happening is a limitation on what can be used as their war force. They can cease a billion ships if they wanted to. But they can only use as many as the build up guidelines state as possible for their war force. That's how the rule works. Yamatai for instance can make as many ships as they want. Nothing stops them from doing that. However they're OOCly limited in how many can be ready for war or used in national defense(even if not ready for war) at any given moment.You're saying ICly we're removing sovereign rights of nations based on OOC articles? I must not be getting that right, since all nations IRL and otherwise have the right to cease property. Sorry if I'm not following.
That's something that should be talked about in those military build up rules themselves. But that technically gives even less reason to have rules on cooperate build up as that would effectively make corporate company owned ships 'less effective' than military owned ones and would result in new rules about how many of those can be used as well.Hum... I do think there is also something that's being missed about these not being professional military forces, too...
Like, if these are supposed to be security forces, and not straight up invasion forces, could they really be relied upon to attack others in the same way a hardened government military could?... And even if the relevant government was totally okay with hosting a bunch of well armed fearless psychos, doesn't that also imply that corporate corruption would be rife?...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?