But it really doesn't seem worded that way as a discussion. It's posed that way, but the fact that I can click in here and it looks like an argument instantly broke out?Legix, this is probably the "about roleplaying" side of "If you have a question about roleplaying or the setting, ask here!"
I'm confused why this is being posted in setting discussion when it has nothing to do with the setting. This doesn't seem like it was a discussion but some sort of way to validate an action/course of events.
" This whole thing is a sham of the highest order. It's not a discussion, it's an attempt to get out of trouble.some sort of way to validate an action/course of events.
We do not maintain the right to determine whether or not their post is canonical regardless of activity, particularly so if the posts are requested as retconned by the player maintaining their Player Rights.I see, so perhaps this should be more of a question regarding etiquette. Let me rephrase these questions.
So now I ask the community, at what point do we determine that a post is canonical regardless of player activity?
At what point do we determine that a member has made a commitment to see a plot through to the end without screwing everyone over by pulling his consent because all of a sudden he feels inclined to leave for whatever reason?
And finally, when two plots scrape against each other with conflicting continuity are the GM's obligated to work with each other to correct the plot hole since they're not really just players at that point, they are actually taking a leading role?
And a new question, how do players feel when someone pulls the carpet out from under their feet?
This is now about etiquette. Please keep answers to what you feel is socially accepted, not just what the player rights state as this is not about making or changing rules.
I see, so perhaps this should be more of a question regarding etiquette. Let me rephrase these questions.
So now I ask the community, at what point do we determine that a post is canonical regardless of player activity?
At what point do we determine that a member has made a commitment to see a plot through to the end without screwing everyone over by pulling his consent because all of a sudden he feels inclined to leave for whatever reason?
And finally, when two plots scrape against each other with conflicting continuity are the GM's obligated to work with each other to correct the plot hole since they're not really just players at that point, they are actually taking a leading role?
And a new question, how do players feel when someone pulls the carpet out from under their feet?
This is now about etiquette. Please keep answers to what you feel is socially accepted, not just what the player rights state as this is not about making or changing rules.
You assumed because I immediately didn't say no, and answered your questions (When I didn't know what you planned to do), that you had consent.So why didn't you immediately say no to the meeting?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?