I guess this sort of involves me?
Anyway I don't have an issue with these rulings or guides or w/e you guys eventually decide to call them, I can't see a way it would break rp unless corps make faction specific gear which is another matter in itself, if a corp is making faction specific stuff then it's as simple as finding a different piece of tech and afaik it's always been like this even if not explicitly stated.
GH has it's commission line which is the only real restricted tech we make, essentially it can only be used by the entity who IC bought the designs and is not available to any other groups unless I make an exception in conjunction with the commission owner. All this article is saying in my eyes at least, is that people just have to let the corp owner know if they plan on using their stuff, and that we can't have our work destroyed as Eth said.
Now for an explanation, @Zack
, I don't write any of this as a means to attack or contradict your statement or interpretation but I don't see how it gives people more ways to declare things non canon when essentially it is the CM who is getting more ability to control the corp's image. I'd like to be able to sit down and talk it over with you and try to see it more clearly from your perspective as the best way to resolve disagreements is to understand all the sides, no one is putting me up to this and I'm fairly well associated with many people all over the place, I just want to work towards getting people to understand each other and if it takes me years so be it but I have never come across an argument that can't be resolved in any group whether online or in my own community.
Sorry all for the rather large post but more or less I support the idea of a full list of corps other than the few listed in the nomenclature article, the CM rights don't seem overly restrictive or too lenient either. ^^